Trusted Path gives engineering leaders in regulated sectors a measurable path from ad‑hoc practice to continuous assurance. Security, privacy and resilience treated as engineering disciplines, not compliance overhead.
DORA, NIS2, CMMC, the AI Act and updated ISO controls have all landed inside the same planning window. Each one lands on the same engineers.
GRC automation proves controls to auditors but does nothing inside a sprint. Threat modelling tools live apart from delivery. Spreadsheets carry the rest.
Engineering leaders are asked to go faster and prove more, at the same time, with the same people. The answer is not another portal. It is a measurable path.
Trusted Path unifies the three concerns that matter to regulators and to engineers: security, privacy and resilience. Treated as disciplines inside the delivery lifecycle, not bolt‑on audits at the end of it.
Threat modelling, secure design review and vulnerability management embedded into the places engineers already work.
Data protection by design, surfaced at the point features are planned, not after launch.
Operational resilience engineered in: failure modes named, tested, and owned by the teams that ship.
To help software development teams produce secure, privacy‑enabled and resilient software.
To help enterprises produce and use mature software that is trustworthy.
Software maturity is the combined strength of three interdependent pillars: security, privacy and operational resilience. Our platform makes this maturity measurable, achievable and visible to every team.
Every engineering team sits somewhere on the curve. Trusted Path maps where you are, where you need to be for the regulations you face, and the smallest next move that gets you there.
Trusted Path is built for teams of 50 to 1,000 in financial services, healthcare and critical infrastructure. Where delivery has to move, and where the burden of proof is not optional.
A platform view of engineering health across teams, mapped to the regulatory story you have to tell the board.
A clear path from current practice to target maturity, with the smallest next move always named.
Team‑level assessments that surface the gap, not the blame, and keep the sprint intact.
A single source of truth for programme‑wide assurance, evidence and dependency risk.
Engineering assurance has a reputation for being adversarial. Ours does not. The three values below are how we build the product, and what we ask of the teams we work with.
Assurance tools are usually pointed at engineers, rarely at the work engineers actually do. We build the other way round. Understanding the constraints is the precondition for changing them.
Maturity scores are auditable end to end. No black boxes. No proprietary magic. Every number traces back to a decision a human can challenge and a piece of evidence a human can inspect.
Trust is earned inside sprints, not inside slide decks. We measure ourselves on whether engineering teams choose to keep using the platform after the auditor has left the room.
The market has plenty of tools for proving controls to auditors and plenty of tools for running threat models in isolation. Trusted Path is the layer that makes them useful inside engineering.
We are taking a small number of engineering organisations worldwide through a structured six‑week pilot. Fixed scope, fixed outcome, founder involved throughout.
